<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Labels Taking Charge: Monitisation on Video Channels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themusicvoid.com/2009/11/labels-taking-charge-monitisation-on-video-channels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themusicvoid.com/2009/11/labels-taking-charge-monitisation-on-video-channels/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=labels-taking-charge-monitisation-on-video-channels</link>
	<description>One of the music industry’s leading sources for music industry opinions, insights and interviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:39:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Vs. PRS &#8211; Whoever Wins, It Will Probably Be Bad News For Content Owners</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicvoid.com/2009/11/labels-taking-charge-monitisation-on-video-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-3670</link>
		<dc:creator>YouTube Vs. PRS &#8211; Whoever Wins, It Will Probably Be Bad News For Content Owners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicvoid.com/?p=1715#comment-3670</guid>
		<description>[...] Labels Taking Charge: Monitisation on Video Channels [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Labels Taking Charge: Monitisation on Video Channels [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myspace sets sights on TV</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicvoid.com/2009/11/labels-taking-charge-monitisation-on-video-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-3645</link>
		<dc:creator>Myspace sets sights on TV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicvoid.com/?p=1715#comment-3645</guid>
		<description>[...] Labels Taking Charge: Monitisation on Video Channels [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Labels Taking Charge: Monitisation on Video Channels [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Content, Content Everywhere&#8230;Costs more than you think</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicvoid.com/2009/11/labels-taking-charge-monitisation-on-video-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-3425</link>
		<dc:creator>Content, Content Everywhere&#8230;Costs more than you think</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 13:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicvoid.com/?p=1715#comment-3425</guid>
		<description>[...] of Streaming Services, Spotify Remains Buoyant Can You Harness The Power Of Free In Your Business Labels Taking Charge: Monitisation on Video Channels   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Streaming Services, Spotify Remains Buoyant Can You Harness The Power Of Free In Your Business Labels Taking Charge: Monitisation on Video Channels   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vevo &#8211; Another Failed Venture or A Virtual Video Goldmine?</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicvoid.com/2009/11/labels-taking-charge-monitisation-on-video-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-3006</link>
		<dc:creator>Vevo &#8211; Another Failed Venture or A Virtual Video Goldmine?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicvoid.com/?p=1715#comment-3006</guid>
		<description>[...] Users Also Read: Vevo Valued at $300 Million? Labels Taking Charge: Monitisation on Video Channels Google Gets Closer To Music   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Users Also Read: Vevo Valued at $300 Million? Labels Taking Charge: Monitisation on Video Channels Google Gets Closer To Music   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Nisbet</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicvoid.com/2009/11/labels-taking-charge-monitisation-on-video-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-2673</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Nisbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicvoid.com/?p=1715#comment-2673</guid>
		<description>The record label is, for all intents and purposes, a curator and distributor of premium content that it is in their interest to share. In the case you&#039;ve noted above, their share is a percentage of ad revenue instead of selling the digital music file or hard copy.

My feeling is that, if properly constructed, UGC models can also be premium content models. That is not to say that, in such models, users must own the music, only that it is in their interest to curate and distribute it, just like the labels do. I don&#039;t disagree with your contention that the major labels are headed into the advertising business, but I am just as interested in directions taken within today&#039;s more open landscape by the existing standing army of music curators and distributors who are both supplementing and supplanting efforts undertaken by the labels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The record label is, for all intents and purposes, a curator and distributor of premium content that it is in their interest to share. In the case you&#8217;ve noted above, their share is a percentage of ad revenue instead of selling the digital music file or hard copy.</p>
<p>My feeling is that, if properly constructed, UGC models can also be premium content models. That is not to say that, in such models, users must own the music, only that it is in their interest to curate and distribute it, just like the labels do. I don&#8217;t disagree with your contention that the major labels are headed into the advertising business, but I am just as interested in directions taken within today&#8217;s more open landscape by the existing standing army of music curators and distributors who are both supplementing and supplanting efforts undertaken by the labels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
