41.5 F
New York
Wednesday, December 6, 2023
HomeArchiveApple vs Motorola and Samsung Patent Battle End Near?

Apple vs Motorola and Samsung Patent Battle End Near?


Related stories

State Of Independence: Small Broadcasters Make Themselves Heard

The quarterly survey on Official Rajar (Radio Joint Audio...

Goodbye and Hello: Sam Altman and OpenAI

An update on the week-long commotion at OpenAI headquarters...

Tainted Love: YouTube and AI

The new statement on YouTube Official Blog might seem...

10 Reasons Why Watching The Grammy Awards Might Be The Least Exciting Thing You Could Do

So are you ready to indulge in an evening of predictability, cringe-worthy moments, and fashion faux pas? As usual, the Grammy Awards on Feb 4, 2024, might not be the most captivating event to grace your screen. Here are ten reasons why subjecting yourself to the telecast could be the least exciting thing you could do on that fateful evening.

Earlier today Roger Chang at Cnet reported that Apple has reached out to the two companies it started a bitter and ongoing patent war against. Interestingly, it was reported that Apple had signaled that it was willing to negotiate licensing deals with both companies. TMV certainly hope it is true, yet we find it intriguing that the company that was the aggressor in this dirty patent war is the one offering a truce. What could be the reasons behind such an about face?

If I were a betting man it would be hard to figure out the odds of who would win the overall war if it were to continue. Both Samsung and Motorola have won a number of battles, as has Apple. So, all in all it has been a pretty even war in terms of court wins across numerous territories. The fact such an about turn from the company who decided to use the ‘Nuclear option’ in the first place appears one day prior to the launch of Apple’s iPad 3 certainly begs the question of why now?

TMV have noted in earlier posts that whilst Apple started the war with Samsung last April, Apple had not licensed some essential patents that are critical to 3G-network reception in both its iPhones since 2008 and the iPad since 2010. We would hazard a guess that whilst yes Apple may have won a couple of its alleged patent breaches by Samsung, the fact is these breaches only extended from April 2011 onwards whereas Apple’s own breaches extended back five years.

What we are getting at here is that the level of payouts would have potentially swung against Apple in terms of Samsung and/or Motorola winning against Apple. Were Apple to win the battle the payouts would have been minimal in comparison. TMV do believe that this may have been what has resulted in Apple’s decision to offer an olive branch to the companies it declared war against. Doe this signify that Apple views a weakness within itself in terms of the war it started or is it a genuine move that is positive for all companies involved and consumers?

Obviously, if these rumors are true it will be great for consumers. The key losers so far of what has been an ongoing and increasingly bitter patent war have been consumers. Why because it has stifled innovation and the fact one of the battles has been over the slide to unlock a phone patent – which in TMV’s view should be considered an industry standard and licensed as such.

Consumers stand to gain the most if a truce is negotiated. TMV would state that Apple also has the most to be gained whilst Motorola and Samsung have the most to lose by agreeing to a truce. However, the fact that as reported both Samsung and Motorola have been demanding more than twice what is regarded as an industry standard royalty for Apple to license their patents could work against them. If the standard FRAND royalty is 1% than both Motorola and Samsung should honor it – as should Apple.

On a final note, it will be interesting to see the responses of both Samsung and Motorola to Apple’s offer of an olive branch. If one company comes to the table and another does not, then it will no doubt continue to be a drawn-out bitter war where the key loser is the consumer.


  • Jakomi Mathews

    Jakomi was the original founder of The Music Void in 2007. His first startup was www.akamedia.net. Where back in 2001 we were able to track audio and audio visual broadcasts. We targeted the music industry performing rights societies as customer but ironically it was the radio broadcast who used our service to prove ads were broadcast to their advertising clients - yet the ironically PRO's started using the service from 2015 when they were dragged kicking and screaming into the 2nd decade of the 21st century. He has deep insights into the inner workings of the music business and digital music generally from working with RWD Magazine and then Rock Sound in the UK during the early 2000's. He was then involved in building some of the first artist mobile apps both before and just after the release of the first iPhone. He also worked with Muse's management for a short time and has managed an assortment of artists from Australia and the UK. He now has a new startup called goto.health which is focused on disrupting the healthcare booking sector on a global basis.


- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here